I want to pull back the curtain and share what I hear about how senior leaders view talent and AI behind closed doors. Here's the guide to junior, mid-level, and senior roles no one says out loud...
Nate
I had a conversation three weeks ago that I can’t shake.
A product manager with eight years of experience—someone who’d shipped products at scale, navigated reorgs, built teams—looked at me and said: “I know I need to demonstrate I’m using AI effectively. I just don’t know what that actually looks like in practice. Do I need to become an AI expert? Do I rebuild my resume around it? What do I actually DO?”
She wasn’t alone. Over the past six months, I’ve had nearly identical conversations with junior engineers trying to move beyond execution work, with mid-career specialists wondering if their domain expertise still matters, with senior leaders worried the grace period on AI adoption is shorter than they think.
Here’s what makes this urgent: the gap between what companies say publicly and what they’re actually doing is massive. Publicly, they’re talking about “AI transformation” and “upskilling everyone.” In closed-door strategy sessions, they’re asking different questions: “Who can we replace? Who’s demonstrating they can do more with AI? Who’s stuck in production mode?”
The people I talk to know this. They’ve read the positioning think pieces. They understand the stakes. They can read between the lines.
But when I ask “what are you actually doing differently?” I get the same answer every time: “I’m using ChatGPT more” or “I’m trying to stay current on tools” or “I’m not really sure.” That gap—between knowing positioning matters and knowing what to actually do about it—is why this guide exists.
You can understand that problem-solving beats production work. You can recognize that domain expertise needs AI amplification. You can know that strategic judgment is your differentiator. But knowing what matters and demonstrating it are two different things.
This guide gives you both.
First, the strategic framework—the honest assessment of where juniors, mid-career professionals, and seniors actually sit in this transition, based on what companies tell me privately.
Then, the tactical playbook—specific exercises, prompts, and positioning frameworks you can use this week to demonstrate value at your career level.
Here’s what you’ll get:
- Reframing exercises that shift you from production to problem-solving mode—stop looking like a task executor and start demonstrating you understand business problems. Includes the specific questions to ask before starting work, the language to use when presenting results, and how to document this shift for performance reviews. Juniors use this to reposition, seniors use it to show execution capability.
- Domain expertise mapping—prove your accumulated knowledge matters in an AI world by showing what you know that can’t be learned from ChatGPT. Includes exercises to separate your learnable skills from your deep expertise, plus specific actions that make your domain knowledge visible to managers and interviewers. Essential for mid-career, but helps everyone understand where differentiation actually lives.
- Strategic judgment demonstrations—make years of experience visible by showing what AI analysis misses and why your pattern recognition matters. Includes worked examples of catching what models overlook, language for positioning experience in interviews, and practical adoption plans that don’t require you to become an AI expert overnight. Critical for seniors, but juniors benefit from learning how to demonstrate judgment early.
- Positioning language that doesn’t require expertise you don’t have—talk about your AI work in performance reviews, interviews, and internal conversations without sounding like you’re either clueless or overselling capabilities. Includes specific phrases that demonstrate strategic value and scripts for common questions like “how are you using AI?”
- Before/after frameworks that prove AI makes you more valuable—document productivity gains with actual numbers, show how you verify AI outputs, and demonstrate that your workflows are reusable by others. Turns “I use ChatGPT” into concrete proof of multiplied impact.
- Working prompts you can use with AI—6 structured prompts that apply these frameworks to your actual job, generating positioning language for your specific situation and creating action plans you can execute this week.
What you won’t find is generic advice about “staying current” or “being adaptable.” You’ll get frameworks that reflect what’s actually happening in strategy meetings, not what’s being said in press releases. The strategic analysis explains why your position matters. The tactical guide shows you how to act on it.
I created both together so you’d have a map of the territory and clarity on the path you want to take.
Q: Nate, why do this as one guide with Juniors, Mid-Level, and Seniors?A: It’s useful to read tactics from all three levels regardless of where you sit. Juniors benefit from demonstrating strategic judgment that looks senior. Seniors need to show they can execute with AI tools like juniors do. Mid-career professionals pull from both directions depending on the situation. The boundaries aren’t rigid categories you slot into—they’re a toolkit you draw from based on what you need to prove in any given conversation, review, or interview. Understanding all three levels means you can deploy the right positioning for the context, not just your job title.
And with that, let’s dive in!
Subscribers get all these newsletters!
Subscribed
Grab the Career Action Framework
This article is the strategic analysis—the frameworks, the positioning, the honest assessment of where you sit and what you need to do. But strategy without tactics is just theory.
I’ve built a separate action guide with specific prompts, exercises, and frameworks for each career level. It includes:
- The problem-solving positioning exercise for juniors
- The domain expertise mapping framework for mid-career professionals
- The AI adoption roadmap for seniors
- Specific prompts for demonstrating value at each level
This is the conversation we should be having about AI transitions. Not the sanitized corporate messaging, not the generic “upskill” advice, but the honest strategic reality of how to navigate this moment based on where you actually sit in your career.
The information asymmetry between what leaders tell me privately and what companies say publicly is real. I’m trying to close that gap. Use these frameworks.
What Companies Won’t Admit About AI Transitions (But Tell Me in Private): Advice for Juniors, Mid-Career, and Seniors
=======================================================================================================================
Corporate communication about AI is failing you.
Not because companies are lying—they’re not. But because they’re optimizing for legal safety, HR compliance, and brand reputation rather than giving you the strategic information you need to navigate your career. The result is a wave of generic, stilted messaging that tells you AI is “transforming the workplace” without giving you the specific playbook for your career level.
I’ve spent the last year in closed-door conversations with Fortune 100 leaders, scale-up executives, and entrepreneurs navigating AI transitions across their organizations. What they tell me privately is markedly different from what they say publicly. And that gap is leaving people—juniors, mid-career, and seniors—without the strategic clarity they need.
This is the honest conversation we should be having.
The Framework: Three Levels, Three Strategic Positions
The career advice landscape is treating AI transitions as monolithic. “Learn to prompt.” “Embrace AI.” “Upskill.” This is useless. Your strategic position depends entirely on where you sit in your career arc, and the tactics that work for juniors actively harm seniors.
Here’s what I’m seeing in practice:
Juniors (0-5 years) face a Value Visibility Gap. Companies can’t see the difference between your work and what ChatGPT produces, which puts you on the chopping block. Your strategy is to push yourself along the Production-to-Problem-Solving Spectrum.
Mid-career professionals (5-10 years) face a Domain-vs-Skills Matrix. Skills are easier to acquire now; domain expertise is not. Your strategy is to double down on expertise, even if you’re unhappy with your current niche, while making calculated adjacent moves.
Seniors (10+ years) have a Grace Period. Companies are relaxing AI requirements for senior hires because they desperately need systems thinking and deep experience. Your strategy is to leverage this window while demonstrating you can apply AI to decades of problem-solving knowledge.
Let me unpack each of these.
Juniors: The Production-to-Problem-Solving Spectrum
If you’re in your first 3-5 years of your career, you’re in one of two camps. Either you’re treasured as fresh blood—creative, hardworking, unburdened by legacy thinking—or you’re on the chopping block.
The chopping block isn’t personal. It’s structural. And it happens because of what I call the Value Visibility Gap: the company cannot distinguish between the value you bring and what AI can produce.
Most companies frame junior-level work as production tasks. “Produce this document.” “Run this analysis.” “Build this cashflow model.” This framing is killing you because it positions your work as AI-replaceable. The moment leadership can’t see the problem-solving underneath the production, you become a cost optimization target.
The strategic move is to reposition yourself along what I call the Production-to-Problem-Solving Spectrum:
[Pure Production] ←――――――――――――→ [Problem Solving]
AI-replaceable AI-augmentedOn the left side: you execute defined tasks. You produce deliverables. You follow templates. This is where AI is genuinely threatening.
On the right side: you solve ambiguous problems. You frame solutions. You identify what needs to be built before you build it. This is where AI becomes your force multiplier rather than your replacement.
The non-obvious insight: You have to make this transition yourself in most organizations because they’re not set up to assess juniors for problem-solving ability. Career ladders still frame junior work as production. Your job is to push right on that spectrum as aggressively as you can.
How? Start solving problems before you’re asked to. Reframe “build the report” as “what business question is this report answering, and is this the right format?” Bring options, not just outputs. Show you understand the why, not just the what.
If you’re stuck on the production side—and I know many of you are—your only option is to demonstrate you’re 10-20x more productive using AI. Show that with AI, you can produce dramatically more output than your peers. This won’t solve the Value Visibility Gap permanently, but it buys you time to develop the problem-solving skills that will.
Mid-Career: The Domain-vs-Skills Matrix
If you’re 5-10 years into your career, you’re facing a different calculus. The conventional wisdom says you should be developing skills to reach senior level. But skills are easier to acquire now. What’s harder—and more valuable—is deep domain expertise.
Think of this as a Domain-vs-Skills Matrix:
High Skill
|
|
Low Domain ―――――――――+――――――――― High Domain
|
|
Low SkillPre-AI, you climbed the ladder by moving from low-skill/low-domain (junior) to high-skill/high-domain (senior). The path was clear: develop both in parallel.
Post-AI, skills are more commoditized. AI can teach you skills. It can help you execute on skills you barely understand. What AI cannot do is give you years of accumulated domain experience—the pattern recognition, the stakeholder relationships, the institutional knowledge, the scar tissue from failed projects.
Your strategic advantage as a mid-career professional is domain expertise. You know fintech, or gaming, or supply chain, or whatever your vertical is. That knowledge differentiates you from juniors and makes you more valuable than pure skill execution.
The uncomfortable reality: Many of you are unhappy with your domain. I’ve talked to enough mid-career people to know this isn’t rare. You fell into fintech and you want to move to climate tech. You’re in gaming and you want to switch to healthcare. I get it.
But abandoning domain expertise right now is high-risk. You don’t know if your next employer will give you credit for your years of experience if you’re switching domains entirely. The smarter play is an adjacent hop—find a role that carries credit for your existing expertise while moving you toward the domain you actually want.
On the skills side, you need to proactively socialize your AI proficiency. This means:
- Sharing your prompts and problem-solving approaches with your team
- Teaching others how you decompose tasks for AI execution
- Demonstrating how you verify AI outputs
- Building reusable frameworks that others can use
These were previously ML engineering skills. Now they’re baseline expectations for mid-career professionals. If you’re not doing them, you’re falling behind.
Seniors: The Grace Period Hypothesis
If you have 10-15+ years of experience, I have good news: you have the most grace on AI right now.
I’m seeing companies actively change their hiring practices to reduce AI assessment requirements for senior candidates. They don’t want to miss experienced people because those people can’t prompt yet. Why? Because seniors bring systems understanding, deep problem-solving experience, and institutional knowledge that companies desperately need.
This is what I call the Grace Period Hypothesis: organizations are giving seniors more time to learn AI because they trust that experienced people will apply AI to their existing problem-solving frameworks faster than juniors can develop problem-solving ability from scratch.
The logic is sound. If you’ve built systems, led teams, navigated organizational politics, and solved ambiguous problems for 15 years, you can learn to prompt. You can learn to decompose tasks for AI. You can learn to verify outputs. These are learnable skills that you’ll pick up in months, not years.
What companies cannot teach quickly is the judgment that comes from a decade of scars. They cannot download pattern recognition from hundreds of projects. They cannot replicate the stakeholder intuition that comes from navigating complex organizations.
The strategic implication: You get credit for problem-solving ability and experience that juniors and mid-career professionals have to actively prove. Leverage this. When you interview, lead with systems thinking. Talk about how you’ve stood things up independently. Demonstrate that you can frame problems and architect solutions, and position AI as a tool that will supercharge that existing capability.
You don’t need to prove you’re an AI expert. You need to prove you’re a strategic thinker who will adopt AI tools to amplify your existing strengths.
The OpenAI Proof Point: Why the Best Organizations Hire Across All Levels
Here’s the public validation for everything I’ve described: OpenAI is actively hiring junior vibe coders—not even really engineers.
This surprised people when it became public. OpenAI—the company building the AI tools everyone assumes will replace junior roles—is hiring juniors. Why?
Because they’ve discovered that juniors are exceptionally creative and out-of-the-box thinkers on AI. Juniors don’t have established problem-solving patterns, which makes them more experimental with AI tools. They try things seniors dismiss as “not how we do it.” They find novel applications because they’re not constrained by decades of workflow muscle memory.
OpenAI also hires super-senior people. They want deeply experienced engineers and researchers who can apply AI to years of systems-level thinking. They want people who’ve built complex architectures, navigated technical tradeoffs, and solved hard problems at scale.
What they’ve figured out—and what the best organizations are figuring out—is that you need both. You need the fresh blood and creative chaos of juniors. You need the domain expertise and execution ability of mid-career people. You need the strategic judgment and systems thinking of seniors.
If OpenAI can think about hiring this way, every organization can.
The companies that will win are the ones that rebuild their career ladders to assess problem-solving ability at every level, not production output. They’re the ones that recognize juniors as problem-solvers with less experience rather than production workers who need AI to be competitive. They’re the ones that value domain expertise over generic skills. They’re the ones that give seniors the grace to adopt AI while leveraging their deep experience.
Strategic Implications: What This Means for You
If you’re reading this and trying to figure out where you fit, here’s the honest assessment:
For juniors: You need to aggressively push yourself toward problem-solving work. If your company only gives you production tasks, find ways to reframe them. Show that you understand why the work matters, not just how to execute it. And if you’re truly stuck on pure production, become so productive with AI that you’re indispensable while you develop the problem-solving chops you need.
For mid-career professionals: Your domain expertise is your moat. Protect it, even if you’re not in love with your current domain. Make calculated moves adjacent to your expertise rather than big leaps into unknown territory. And proactively demonstrate your AI proficiency—share your methods, teach your team, build reusable frameworks.
For seniors: You have a grace period, but don’t waste it. You don’t need to become an AI expert overnight, but you do need to show you can apply AI to your existing problem-solving frameworks. Lead with your strategic judgment and systems thinking, and position AI as the tool that will amplify those strengths.
For organizations: If you’re not hiring across all levels, you’re leaving strategic advantage on the table. The best companies have figured this out. Rebuild your career ladders to assess for problem-solving at every level. Give seniors grace while leveraging their experience. Recognize that juniors are creative problem-solvers, not just production workers. Value domain expertise over generic skills.
Make the strategic moves that fit your level. And remember: AI is a tool for solving problems, not a replacement for problem-solving ability.
That’s the distinction that will determine who thrives and who gets left behind.
I make this Substack thanks to readers like you! Learn about all my Substack tiers here
Subscribed
